The past decade has seen an acceleration in practical action by business. Companies have invested in eco-efficiency to find ways to “do more with less,” they have adopted ambitious environmental and social performance targets and managed them as part of the business, and they have opened up with reporting on performance and collaboration with a broader range of stakeholders, from the UN to local communities.
For GE, this is our seventh annual citizenship report, and it has been six years since we launched ecomagination, our first companywide strategy. Our citizenship reports have charted our performance each year, reflecting the development of increasingly robust internal systems and an evolving shift in thinking from a philanthropic focus to incorporating social and environmental issues at the heart of business strategy. This shift has not been cosmetic; over the past decade, GE has repositioned its portfolio through divestitures representing 50% of the Company to focus on key global themes such as energy, water and healthcare, and to build strength in the core businesses by providing the infrastructure and financial services needed for growing economies.
It is not a journey that we have taken alone. Accompanied by many other companies, we have collaborated with organizations such as the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, the UN Global Compact and the Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights. The Milestones in Citizenship timeline charts some of these developments.
Much has been achieved. There is an increasingly clear recognition that companies have to serve two roles. We have to drive economic growth, but we also have to be a force for change.
Leading companies have recognized that they can help to create the world they want to see, not only through community engagement and philanthropy, but through the way they manage their business, the products and services they develop and the public policy positions they advocate.
“If Sustainability 1.0 was about the triple bottom line, and Sustainability 2.0 is about initiatives designed to create various forms of ‘blended value,’ then Sustainability 3.0 must achieve the apparently impossible—pushing towards zero, in emissions, waste and ecological footprints.”John Elkington, Executive Chairman, Volans
“A Green Race has started not just between companies, but also among the major economies that are becoming the leading suppliers of resource-efficient, low-polluting products and services. China is already a world leader in critically important low-carbon technologies, such as solar power, and is catching up in other areas. The U.S. has unparalleled innovation capacity, and when it fully mobilizes to compete in the Green Race it will be a key player.”Björn Stigson, World Business Council for Sustainable Development
“Corporate social responsibility is becoming an expectation for companies doing business in China, whether they are multinationals or Chinese enterprises. Following the law and acting responsibly and ethically are the foundations for business strength, and enable businesses to contribute to society…”Liu Donghua, Founder of the China Entrepreneur Club
“Today there are over two billion people on the Internet, and some 600 million on Facebook alone. This vast new fabric of social connectivity is not only transforming industries and enterprises, it is reshaping the way we learn, create, govern and even care for one another. In virtually all sectors and human endeavors we see people with drive, passion and expertise taking advantage of new Web-based tools to help make the world more prosperous, just and sustainable. As we look ahead, I believe companies can leverage this new social connectivity to amplify their sustainability and social business efforts.”Anthony D. Williams, Co-author, Wikinomics
Alongside GE’s ecomagination and healthymagination goals, Walmart, Dow Chemical, Procter & Gamble, Unilever and the Coca-Cola company are just some of the companies that have set ambitious targets for energy efficiency, renewable energy, waste and water use, and sustainable products.
Businesses have come together with governments, investors, NGOs and other players in collaborations, such as The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis & Malaria and The Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative to solve intractable problems of healthcare, corruption and climate change.
The debate about business and human rights has come a long way through the work of the UN Secretary General’s special representative John Ruggie, who has worked to identify and clarify standards of corporate responsibility and accountability regarding human rights. The “protect, respect and remedy” framework developed through this work has been adopted as part of GE’s own human rights policy.
Experimentation in how to assess and communicate the impacts of products and companies on people, communities and the environment in order to drive better decision making has been critical to the development of corporate responsibility. Key initiatives have included the Global Reporting Initiative, the Carbon Disclosure Project and UN Principles on Responsible Investment. We remain a long way from the ideal of integrated reporting, but it is clear that metrics and measures must continue to improve and show the linkage between social, financial and environmental performance.
“Many companies have preferred to keep their sustainability efforts to themselves, working quietly to transform their operations, products and services. For years, this was seen as admirable. Today, customers and stakeholders want to know in great detail what companies are doing: how they’re measuring and managing their impacts and making continuous improvement.”Joel Makower, Executive Editor, Greenbiz.com
“Businesses need to reframe challenges as opportunities; recognizing that slum dwellers are home-builders, rag pickers are recycling workers, and the poor can be customers. Bringing a better life into reach for more people will take innovation; creating new systems and products that solve access, price and quality issues…for this effort to be sustainable, it can’t just be a single leader’s vision. It must be core to the DNA of the business—understood by shareowners, senior managers and employees as the way the Company creates value.”Pamela Hartigan, Director, Skoll Center for Social Entrepreneurship
“The companies that are at the forefront of social responsibility in Brazil are using their huge power of influence in public policy debates and the media successfully to support public policy development, influence investors and consumers and encourage values that promote sustainable development.”Oded Grajew, Chairman, Instituto Ethos, Brazil
“In South Africa, measuring and reporting on carbon emissions and climate change adaptation started out as a task assigned to the environmental manager. It has graduated to include the portfolios of energy, water and risk as the data begins to tell a story of risk opportunities that are material to investors as well as the public. The public is asking tougher questions as consumers and as local community members who are in competition for depleting ecosystems and access to basics such as food, water, energy and mobility. Stakeholder engagement cannot be something left to the specialists in corporate citizenship—it concerns everyone in the company who communicates with customers, investors, local communities, regulators, policy makers and the public.”Valerie Geen, Director, Climate and Energy, South African National Business Initiative
We have learned many things in our journey so far, not least the importance and difficulty of listening, learning and collaborating with stakeholders. But we have also learned that the challenges are greater, and more fundamental than first imagined.
As GE Board member Sam Nunn says of his own work in reducing nuclear dangers, the global quest for sustainable development is a race between collaboration and catastrophe. Events such as the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and the financial crisis highlight what happens when the problems outrun the solutions.
The urgency of the challenges—innovating products and services to enable better lives for more people within the bounds of the earth’s natural resources, creating societies that protect people from oppression and poverty and enable them to achieve their potential, and creating frameworks of disclosure and regulation which ensure that capital markets direct investment for long-term value creation—mean that the corporate response must shift up a gear, to the next level of rigor, ambition and scale. The complexity of the issues, and risks, in different regions and sectors means that every part of a business must become involved in understanding risks and opportunities related to social and environmental issues.
Rachel Kyte, vice president for Business Advisory Services at the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank, has served on GE’s Citizenship Advisory Panel in recent years. As she puts it, “We are on the edge of something transformative, but we have reached the limits of what can be achieved by continuing on the same path. Businesses will need to be fully integrated around sustainability, with it driving the innovation agenda. Key constraints are not just carbon and water but accessing talent. Corporate citizenship won’t be about value add, but creating shared value.”
In starting to develop our corporate citizenship strategy for the next decade, GE invited practitioners and thought leaders on corporate responsibility to tell us where they think the future is heading. The trends that they highlight are increasing complexity, the need for greater ambition and the continued need for collaboration and transparency.
Blogging Policy:
Comments are welcome anytime; however, please note that your comment needs to be approved by the site owner before it will appear. The site owner generally operates between 9 am and 6 pm ET Monday - Friday. Thanks for your patience.
Comments
Discussion Wall:
Fred Easton said:
August 22, 2011
Based on the discussion, or in this case the lack there of, it would appear that this United Nations Agenda 21 program has been embraced by executive management but hasn’t filtered down to the troops. Why not have the company provide jobs and support the employees with educational, health, programs that are not full of political leanings and just get on with making money. The programs that are available today are a joke….loaded with process and little on delivery. Management goes about patting each other on the back, saying they have given the employees all the tools they need to do their jobs….unfortunately, tops down tool kits are usually lacking what is really required. The money spent on Six-Sigma for the return on investment is very similar to the under funded mortgage mess that has left the company in a serious situation, not to speak of the major moral problem that it created. When a program like this becomes so expensive and so demoralizing, it borders on the definition of insanity….doing the same thing repetitively and expecting different results.
The vetting of these comments goes along with the restrictive environment that is so prevalent through out the business.