GE is committed to maintaining a culture of integrity, transparency, ethics and compliance. Operational excellence means managing social and environmental performance, applying the same performance culture, innovation and talent to these goals as we do to any other business goals.
GE has been working on a company-wide initiative known as Regulatory Excellence since 2007. The initiative emphasizes the responsibility of leaders in every business to ensure regulatory compliance, and it has established a common process for managing regulatory risk areas across the Company.
The GE Board of Directors oversees the implementation of policies in relation to employees, customers, investors and other stakeholders. GE invests in its employees, spending more than $1 billion on training each year. Our non-negotiable expectation of employee integrity is articulated in our policy, The Spirit & The Letter, which requires compliance with law and policy relating to vital issues, such as financial integrity and avoiding conflicts of interest. Available in 31 languages, these integrity policies are provided to all of our employees, holding each person accountable for compliance.
Our strong compliance culture reinforces these efforts by requiring employees to raise any compliance concerns and by prohibiting retribution for doing so. To facilitate open and candid communication, we have about 700 designated ombudspersons throughout the Company who act as independent resources for reporting integrity or compliance concerns. We hold our consultants, agents and independent contractors to the same integrity standards.
A disciplined approach to risk is important in a diversified organization in order to ensure that we are executing according to our strategic objectives and that we only accept risk for which we are adequately compensated. We evaluate risk at the individual transaction level and evaluate aggregate risk at the customer, industry, geographic and collateral-type levels, where appropriate.
In addition, our global risk management systems were further strengthened in August 2009 with the appointment of the GE Chief Risk Officer (CRO), Mark Krakowiak. The CRO develops and implements an enterprise risk management approach for GE to ensure that risk objectives are aligned with our overall company strategy. They work closely with the businesses to aggregate, monitor and mitigate risk through improved controls, policies and procedures, integrating these controls with existing governance and management processes.
The Company continues to work on productivity through process control, Six Sigma, Lean Manufacturing and the development and implementation of new technologies.
To read more about our global risk management framework and business processes, visit: www.gecitizenship.com/our-commitment-areas/compliance-governance/global-risk-management
At the corporate level, three key bodies are responsible for making decisions about citizenship and implementing learnings from the numerous stakeholder dialogues:
To be successful, these inputs must be factored into and considered part of strategy, planning and execution. Citizenship reporting provides an end-of-year overview of our key strategic issues, our responses to them and our performance against stakeholder concerns.

Blogging Policy:
Comments are welcome anytime; however, please note that your comment needs to be approved by the site owner before it will appear. The site owner generally operates between 9 am and 6 pm ET Monday - Friday. Thanks for your patience.
Comments
Discussion Wall:
Todd Cort said:
July 19, 2011
One of the strengths of the GE report has always been the diagram of stakeholder feedback points within te decision-making cycle.
Nevertheless, the discussion of the nuts and bolts of managing sustainability challenges is the weak area of the report. Many of the details that you would see in leaders of this aspect are missing. The result is that while the vision of a sustainable GE is clear and the track record for innovation and product development in this space is prolific, the reader is left wondering whether GE truly ‘has its own house in order’.
Some elements that are unclear from the discussion:
1) What is entailed in ‘Regulatory Excellence’? Is this a trditional management system with tools, metrics, targets, documentation requirements, training, etc?
2) How are standards ‘beyond regulation’ determined and integrated into the management approach?
3) What is the continuous improvement process? Particularly in light of missed commitments such as fatalities.
4) How is GE applying best practices – such as learning from the Macondo well incident on clarifying priorities and embedding practices in line with sustainability prorities? Currently the mphasis is clearly on training and control documents such as The Spirit & The Letter.
5) Although there is some indication of how sustainability aspects are embedded into the Enterprise Risk management Framework, it is unclear how the ERM is applied at the operational level to preserve those criteria.
6) The methods and criteria for ‘filtering’ feedback in decision-making are not clear from the discussion. Is it through the ERM?
7) The equivalent process for ascertaining and utilizing stakeholder feedback in decision-making at the business and operational levels is not discussed, but of course this is where many of the material decisions will be made.
GE Citizenship said:
July 26, 2011
Thank you Todd. You do make some good points in operational excellence. We did discuss the good elements of business and good mechanism in multiple aspects, but you are right that we don’t do a thorough job in linking them back to the risk management process in this report. This is clearly an area we must be better and clearer on in the next reporting cycle. Regarding the stakeholder engagement discussion, the focus of our report is on the large GE community while specific engagement or stakeholder feedback are incorporated back into business and operating level plans. We have not given an example in this report. We have planned specific stakeholder engagement sessions for many GE businesses during the next reporting cycle. You will see the outcomes of that in the 2011 report.